The EntitySpaces Community

Share and learn about the EntitySpaces Architecture.
Welcome to The EntitySpaces Community Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Forums Photos

Browse by Tags

All Tags » testing
  • Re: Just Evaluating using Oracle

    Hi Mike, Thanks for taking the time to formulate your reply. By using Oracle packages per table, we can get around the stored procedure name limit by using dot notation for our calling convention.  The name limit applies to tables as well. The calling convention could then be : Schema.%pkg_%Table_Name.%Generic CRUD name%   This ...
    Posted to Trial Version Support (Forum) by hal9000 on November 3, 2008
  • Just Evaluating using Oracle

    I'm using MyGeneration with the Trial Product. All my tests worked perfectly with mssql test databases. However, Oracle is our target DB for the current project. It would appear that procedure names cannot exceed 30 characters. Can the Stored procedure template and metadata engine be modified to develop Oracle packages  per table ? Then ...
    Posted to Trial Version Support (Forum) by hal9000 on November 3, 2008
  • Re: Unit testing custom code (mocking / interfaces etc...)

    Mike.Griffin:IIf you code was going to load some data, and the mock data provider didn't return that data, how would your test pass, or would the mock data provider somehow interpret the mock requests and feed back test data? Yes, that's pretty much it. Say I wanted to test my custom code that did some logic on a list of orders for a ...
    Posted to Trial Version Support (Forum) by chrisb on September 25, 2007
  • Re: Unit testing custom code (mocking / interfaces etc...)

    PurpleFlux: Maybe even the EntitySpaces team would consider making a Test DataProvider that we could programmatically set up and use for tests (probably just really using a dataset or something). Another approach might be to use the MSAccessProvider. Set up an access db with the appropriate data and for each unit test which requires it you could ...
    Posted to Trial Version Support (Forum) by chrisb on September 24, 2007
  • Re: NullReferenceException on LoadAll()

    David.Parsons: But, think of the second tier as a combination of Custom+Generated, rather than BLL+DAL. And, do not try to further separate them.   A simple version of another question I've asked (but not yet had answered).  With BLL + DAL, you can unit test the BLL without  referencing a live database (ie, you ...
    Posted to General (Forum) by chrisb on September 24, 2007